[Az-Geocaching] New trend in geocaching? Must be easily findable?

[az_pistolero]

Too bad I'm not in the area, or I'd proudly add my DNF to the list.

az_pistolero

On Nov 28, 2009, at 8:21 PM, Gale wrote:

> A recent stink on the national forums was about a cache that had not  
> been found in the two years of its existence despite many attempts.  
> Cachers were concerned that it might happen again.
>
> It did. Here in Az. GC21D5M Folks were looking for this 2 day old  
> cache and not finding it. Now its been disabled by the reviewer  
> because it had too many DNFs, so the owner can check on it, despite  
> the fact that the owner checked on it twice. Is this a new trend in  
> geocaching? All caches must be easily findable by most people?
>
> Tsegi Mike and Desert Viking
>
> Till a voice, as bad as Conscience, rang interminable changes
>   On one everlasting Whisper day and night repeated -- so:
> "Something hidden.  Go and find it. Go and look behind the Ranges --
>   "Something lost behind the Ranges. Lost and waiting for you. Go!"
>
> Rudyard Kipling ,   The Explorer  1898

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/20091128/ed60dfa2/attachment.htm>