[Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!

[MEL HOCKWITT]

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: ShadowAce<mailto:shadowace.az at gmail.com> 
  To: listserv at azgeocaching.com<mailto:listserv at azgeocaching.com> 
  Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 12:14 AM
  Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!


  Hmm..

   Interesting.. Nope


   Sorry my comment was _ I stress again _ Not about to Micro or Not to Micro..

   It was about GET PERMISSION FOR THE CACHE YOU PLACE..

   Then feel free to log how you really feel on a micro or non micro cache. No more wondering if I will be arrested or just asked to get off the property when I look around a power box. 



  On 2/10/07, noshdoo tsoh <geocaching at deepsouthwest.com<mailto:geocaching at deepsouthwest.com>> wrote: 
    "Trust me, just because there are more micros than rural caches, doesn't mean they're more POPULAR."



    It's not the number of caches that makes them popular, but the number of finds on each cache. The fact that they are found at a rate exponentially higher than other caches does indicate popularity. Or am I missing the definition of 'popular'? Back it up with numbers?  ;-)



    "We're trying to encourage good micros and urban caches and discourage the placement of bad ones."



    A noble cause, indeed. Can I see you're scientific study on what is good and what is bad? You are the decider? Oh, that's right, trust you.



    Back to you're regularly scheduled rant…




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/20070212/07fea5f8/attachment.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 20755 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/20070212/07fea5f8/attachment.jpeg