[Az-Geocaching] updated stats

Steven Stringham sstringh at stringham-family.org
Thu Sep 22 08:19:27 MST 2005


I am trying to get an understanding of those persons posting on my 
thread on this topic. Renegade is one of the more active posters. As 
such, and seeing as I don't know him, I am trying to come to an 
understanding of his background, or where he may be coming from.

It was suggested that two of the posters LaPaglia AND Hemlock were "sent 
in" on this topic. I am wondering about Renegade.

There is a point at which you can realize that you have been told to sit 
down and shut up, and that no one is listening. I am wondering do I keep 
fighting, or just give up?

It is nice to know that he has been helpful in the past. Thank you.

Steve (Tierra Buena).

>It'll feel so good when you stop.
>
Are you saying it will feel good to me (because my head will no longer 
be bashing, or that you want me to stop?


Andrew Ayre wrote:

>What about him? He helped me and a couple of other people come up with the
>key ideas for handicaching.com.
>
>Andy
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: az-geocaching-bounces at listserv.azgeocaching.com
>[mailto:az-geocaching-bounces at listserv.azgeocaching.com]On Behalf Of
>Steven Stringham
>Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 8:07 AM
>To: listserv at azgeocaching.com
>Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] updated stats
>
>
>Any thoughts on Renegade Knight?
><http://forums.groundspeak.com/GC/index.php?showuser=37117>
>
>AZcachemeister wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I looked at most of those regional sites. Very few are more than Yahoo
>>groups. Those that have a 'stats' link are simply linking to the
>>'grand-high-poobah' site, with no filtering of state-specific stats as
>>AZgeocaching does. It seems that AZgeocaching is the only site with
>>anything at stake in this 'battle'.
>>LaPaglia is also CO-Admin, our former cache listing approver. Hemlock
>>is a forum moderator (who may also have other 'duties' at
>>Geocaching.com).
>>
>>Steven Stringham wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>I was trying hard to not mention any sites specificly in the forums.
>>>For a couple of reasons. I was trying to fight for not just AZGC but
>>>for all of them. Also, I did not want to point out any specificly
>>>that were working so as to not get them blocked. I did mention a page
>>>where one of the forum moderators mentioned a number of SW regional
>>>sites, however.
>>>
>>>Is it just that they don't care? Is it that I really am not doing a
>>>site myself and so have no power to negotiate (that may be it). I
>>>don't know. I don't frequent the forums very much.
>>>
>>>Steve (Tierra Buena) mentioned that a couple of those that responded
>>>were "sent in". Are these schills? Can anyone expand on these accounts?
>>>
>>>
>>>Am I just beating my head against the wall with no good results, talking
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>into a deaf ear?
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>When they send both LaPaglia AND Hemlock into a thread, you've already
>>>received your answer.
>>>It'll feel so good when you stop.
>>>
>>>Steve
>>>Team Tierra Buena
>>>
>>>
>>>AZcachemeister wrote:
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>I mentioned that in the forum thread...it was passed over.
>>>>
>>>>connie stahlman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>Interesting to see that
>>>>>http://grand_high_pobah.home.comcast.net/Arizona1.html is still
>>>>>getting updates on stats--
>>>>>http://grand_high_pobah.home.comcast.net/LocationIndex.html
>>>>>____________________________________________________________
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>


More information about the Az-Geocaching mailing list