[Az-Geocaching] Placing a Terracache

[Joseph Hammer]

O.K. So the nudecachers pic could show up on any cache on GC.COM but
the all the pics of nudecachers are on one cache at TC.COM which one
does it seem more likely that you would come across?
Cacheaholik


On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 19:26:14 -0700, Brian Casteel <bcasteel at uccinc.net> wrote:
> Because there are over 148k caches around the world, and I'm not going to
> follow his pursuits around in caching because I have something better to do.
>  This is one person, while the Nude LC is a dare to do what Nudecacher does,
> and is far more visible than an individual.  A site that endorses such a
> cache I have a problem with.
>  
> Brian
> Team A.I.
>  
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: TEAM 360 
> To: az-geocaching at listserv.azgeocaching.com 
> Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 12:12 PM
> Subject: [Az-Geocaching] Placing a Terracache
> 
> You bet, I will place some Terracaches. (Just as soon as I buy a gps!) 
> I like to see the competition, if TC grows enough, maybe GC will sit up and
> take notice!
> Also, I have to ask all you "Anti-Nude Cacher" people: Where were you for
> the past couple of years, while NudeCacher was posting his pics over at
> GC.com??? No one said anything about THAT, but you are willing to jump all
> over TC.com for the same thing. 
> Yes, TC.com lists Virts. So does GC.com. Same thing with Locationless. There
> are plenty of ALL cache types on both sites. 
> So what??
> If you don't like a certain type of cache, then don't do it. It's just that
> simple.
> Back in the beginning, all cache types were lumped together in your stats.
> Then people whined, and got the cache types categorized. 
> Now they want caching sites that only list traditonal types of caches? 
> Enough already!
> For those who say that TC is "Wild West" caching, with no rules, and
> anything goes: I challenge you to actually TAKE A LOOK at TC.com. They have
> a cache rating system. If the cache don't cut it, it will find itself
> archived soon enough. Also, your sponsors on TC.com are actual cachers, and
> believe it or not, many of them have COMMON SENSE. They know where the line
> is.
> Do you have to make a choice between GC.com and TC.com? No, not at all...the
> two sites complement each other, actually, and between them, cover most
> aspects of caching. Every cacher will find something they like.
> Now all we have to do is get AZgeocaching.com to crawl TC.com and add finds
> to your totals displayed on AZgeocaching, for those of you who log online...
> Look, I am not saying TC.com is perfect. But neither is GC.com.
> It's good to help the little guy out. It wasn't so long ago that GC.com only
> had a few caches listed on it, too.
> Jeff.
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> 
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> 
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
> 
> 
>