[Az-Geocaching] Poll

[Brian Casteel]

Hardly.  It's just the most visible example of what is bad about the site
philosophy.  Pics by Nudecacher on pages are often deleted or asked to be
modified due to the revealing nature of them.  The available domain was a
stab at MBH to have a little fun with it.  To avoid posting for a third
time, my opinion is of the overall site right now, with my greatest concern
having to do with the LC in question.  The secondary concern is, if
something this 'soft' is allowed, what's next in concept before the limits
are breached in a whole new way?  I never said the entire site was porn
caches, but I see a bad trend coming out of this if it isn't kept in check.
Truthfully, I'd like to see the LC go away and my perception might change a
bit.

 

Brian
Team A.I.

 

 

  _____  

From: az-geocaching-bounces at listserv.azgeocaching.com
[mailto:az-geocaching-bounces at listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of Gale
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 11:30 PM
To: listserv at azgeocaching.com
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Poll

 

Almost all the caches Ive seen on TC are regular non porn caches. Ive seen
worse at gc.com from nudecacher posting his photos on caches. Ive watched
the conversation and it does seem a bit hypocritical to put down tc.com for
that, when nudecacher's photos cant be ignored since he places them randomly
without warning on caches. In my opinion, gc.com shouldnt be considered a
family oriented site when they allow nudecacher to post his photos like
that. You make it seem like all the caches at tc.com are horrible things
that are not fit for anyone's eyes. 

Brian Casteel <bcasteel at uccinc.net> wrote: 

Available names porncaching.com

Brian
Team A.I.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Wood" 
To: ; "Guy Aldrich" 
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 6:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Poll


> At 06:26 PM 3/17/2005, you wrote:
>>How many of you would be willing to place a Terracache?If your answer
>>is no please explain why.
>
> Yes, but they won't be traditional types of caches. If I hide regular 
> caches they will still be on GC.com. I will us TC.com for some virtuals I 
> have in mind.
>
> I am still hopeful that TC.com will fill that virtual cache void left by 
> GC,com but only time will tell on that. I will also not boycott them for 
> allowing adult themed caches as I have NO problem at all with them.
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
> 


____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching

Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com

 

Tsegi Mike and Desert Viking

 

Till a voice, as bad as Conscience, rang interminable changes
  On one everlasting Whisper day and night repeated -- so:
"Something hidden.  Go and find it. Go and look behind the Ranges --
  "Something lost behind the Ranges. Lost and waiting for you. Go!"

 

Rudyard Kipling ,   The Explorer  1898

  _____  

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=31637/*http:/smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/>
our new resources site! 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserv.sequoia.net/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/20050318/62a8f2b5/attachment.htm