[Az-Geocaching] READ THIS CACHE SITE -

[AZcachemeister]

ShadowAce wrote:

>Here is his reasons:
>
>- The travel bugs that I removed from this cache had been in the cache
>an average of 25 days each, and each of these travel bugs had been
>passed up by an average of 10 geocaching teams before I grabbed them.
>I took five travel bugs, but I immediately moved two of them to nearby
>caches later in the same day. I took pictures of those travel bugs and
>uploaded them to both my cache and travel bug log entries.
>
Mr. Lowpointer:
And this is your concern in what way?
Were any of the TBs in question yours?
Did the owners contact you and ask you to get involved?

>- There is no need for a travel bug hotel in this location. There are
>many geocaches nearby with regular-sized containers. This is not in
>the middle of the city but is near the edge of Tonto National Forest.
>There are over 50 caches within a five-mile radius of this location,
>and most of these caches have containers that are large enough to fit
>most travel bugs. It may take a little more effort, but if one has
>multiple travel bugs, isn't it better to put them in a variety of
>different caches rather than one single cache?
>  
>
Mr. Lowpointer:
Perhaps there is no need for any Travel Bug Hotels, anywhere.
The owner has chosen to call it a Travel Bug Hotel, and cachers have 
chosen to leave Travel Bugs in it.
Certainly made things convenient for you, didn't it?

>- This cache is exposed and is very close to a street corner. The
>cache site is close enough to be seen by motorists who are stopped at
>the stop sign. Whenever I come here, I see new litter desosited in the
>area, and usually I pick some of it up. There is good chance that this
>cache could be found accidentally by a non-geocacher, who would likely
>take the cache and/or it contents, especially since the contents
>contain a large variety of music and computer CDs which is more
>valuable than the contents of most caches. I do not like to put travel
>bugs in caches that I feel are too exposed.
>  
>
Mr. Lowpointer:
If you don't like the cache, or the location, STAY AWAY.
Many caches in less accessible areas have come up missing, the contents 
are irrelevant.
Not wanting to put a Travel Bug in does not give you the right to remove 
them all.


>- The geocacher who commented on what I did on the cache page has
>nearly 1,000 cache findings, but has more than 2,000 travel bug
>findings. I, on the other hand, have close to 1,600 cache findings,
>but I have less than 400 travel bug finds. Enough said.
>  
>
Mr. Lowpointer:
What the hell does MaxB's find count and Travel Bug count (or how they 
compare to yours) have to do with ANYTHING?
Max B seems to be interested in TRADING Travel Bugs. If he takes three, 
he leaves three. Thus assuring others will at least have some Travel 
Bugs available if that's what they're after.


_Now_ enough HAS been said.

>Ken Akerman (a.k.a. Highpointer)
>____________________________________________________________
>Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
>To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
>http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
>Arizona's Geocaching Resource
>http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>
>
>  
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserv.sequoia.net/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/20050417/ca00a934/attachment.htm