[Az-Geocaching] Favorite/ Most unusual/ Most extreme cache

[listserv@azgeocaching.com]

Larry and Gidget did that cache,no way was I going up there. Even Gidget
came down and left Larry up there by himself to finish. The only way to come
down is on your rearend in which Larry ripped the heck out of his pants.
--Connie
Team "Wyle E"

> -----Original Message-----
> From: az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com
> [mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com]On Behalf Of
> RopingThe Wind
> Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2004 8:49 PM
> To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
> Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] Favorite/ Most unusual/ Most extreme cache
>
>
> I agree with Steve... I love those kinds of caches! The more
> treacherous it
> is to get to it (the more adventure), the more fun it is!!!! I
> did a cache
> just recently up on Mingus Mnt that was less than 75' from the road (nice
> graded dirt road)... but, it was a dangerous cache! One very slight wrong
> move (footing) and you were going for a ride down the slope, off an
> approximately 30-40' drop and onto the road. There was nothing to grab a
> hold of to stop your fall either. If you were lucky enough to have your
> pickup truck sitting on the side of the road and you landed in
> the back of
> it.. great! Suspension would cushion the blow! :) hehehe LOL  I
> thought the
> terrain rating was a bit high at first, but after making it to
> the cache, I
> understood the need for the 4 star terrain rating! :)
>
> Scott
> Team Ropingthewind
>
>
> >From: "Team Tierra Buena" <teamtierrabuena@earthlink.net>
> >Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
> >To: <listserv@azgeocaching.com>
> >Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] Favorite/ Most unusual/ Most extreme cache
> >Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 19:56:49 -0700
> >
> > > This raises an interesting question, should caches be archived because
> > > someone considers them dangerous?  If so, what is the basis of that
> > > decision?
> >This question comes up with some regularity on the Groundspeak forums.
> >Do a search for "dangerous" on titles only in the "Geocaching Topics"
> >forum and you'll find several.
> >I think as long as a cache description clearly states potential hazards
> >and is given appropriate difficulty and terrain ratings there should be
> >no reason to archive a cache solely because there is some risk involved
> >in finding it.
> >Steve
> >Team Tierra Buena
> >
> >____________________________________________________________
> >Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> >To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> >http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> >
> >Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> >http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
> http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>