[Az-Geocaching] Why very few new caches lately in Arizona?

[Trisha]

So, I vote that we BOYCOTT this MO cache that nobody has been to in
the horrendously long time of 2 weeks....since he is whining anyway
and that is SO annoying!! ha ha ha....
Teach that know-it-all NW'er a lesson, HUH?
geez, what are we all doing on line in the afternoon? Do we all NOT
work, even AT work??
Geez #2 I sure hope everybody else is in a good mood and joking around
like I am!

Trisha 
(no, I don't work, and my daughter had early release today from
school...)


On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 14:29:34 -0700 (PDT), Gale Draper wrote:

>From the guidelines page:
 

Placing Caches on Vacation 
Placing caches on vacation is unacceptable and these caches will not
be approved on the web site. As the cache owner you are obligated to
be in a position to manage your caches, and caches placed on vacation
require someone else to maintain them for you. Please be responsible. 
"Ford, Denny" <denny.ford6@honeywell.com> wrote:


@font-face {
	font-family: Tahoma;
}
@page Section1 {size: 8.5in 11.0in; margin: 1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;
}
P.MsoNormal {
	FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"
}
LI.MsoNormal {
	FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"
}
DIV.MsoNormal {
	FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"
}
A:link {
	COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlink {
	COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
A:visited {
	COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
	COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
P {
	FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY:
"Times New Roman"
}
SPAN.EmailStyle18 {
	COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial
}
DIV.Section1 {
	page: Section1
}


Ok I know I have been out of it for a while,
but what is a vacation cache?
and what are the rules that go along with it?
 
Denny
Tres Hombres

-----Original Message-----From: Team Tierra Buena
[mailto:TeamTierraBuena@earthlink.net]Sent: Tuesday, September 09,
2003 2:13 PMTo: listserv@azgeocaching.comSubject: RE: [Az-Geocaching]
Why very few new caches lately in Arizona?

 
 
-----Original Message-----From:
az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com
[mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of
Gale DraperSent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:33 PMTo:
listserv@azgeocaching.comSubject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why ve
 ry few
 new caches lately in Arizona?
 

>From the forums
http://ubbx.groundspeak.com/6/ubb.x?a=tpc&s=5726007311&f=4416058331&m=82160838

 
I've been wondering why those who love member's only caches haven't
hit this one. This guy seems to be taunting us with his remarks about
Arizona cachers.
 
And *I&#65533;M*  wondering how this &#65533;vacation cache&#65533;
even got approved? Perhaps MOCs are exempt from the &#65533;vacation
cache&#65533; rule?
 
Steve
Team Tierra Buena 
Till a voice, as bad as Conscience, rang interminable changes  On one
everlasting Whisper day and night repeated -- so:"Something hidden. 
Go and find it. Go and look behind the Ranges --  "Something lost
behind the Ranges. Lost and waiting for you. Go!"

 

Rudyard Kipling ,   The Explorer  1898
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software