[Az-Geocaching] Thoughts on Cheaters and Mos-skeeters!!
RAND HARDIN
listserv@azgeocaching.com
Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:43:43 -0700
------=_NextPart_001_0001_01C32A9F.50BDF9A0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Since the subject of not signing the logs has come up again, I could not =
pass this opportunity to yank Omniterranaut's chain. [;)] Recently, Om=
niterranaut tied the record with Sprocket for most-finds in one day. As =
with past record holders (CacheLess, Webbman and Sprocket) they had all b=
een given the third degree about their accomplishments. So far Omniterra=
naut's record has been unchallenged - nobody has given him the third degr=
ee . . . UNTIL NOW!
This last Sunday I visited five caches that Omniterranaut listed as cache=
s he had visited on his record-tying day of finding fifty-four caches. I=
need to ask: "Where are your signatures in the log books or on the log s=
heets Omniterranaut? What's with these little post-its with your name on=
them stuck inside the caches? Two of them had fallen out when I opened =
the caches - and had I not put them back in, there would be no record of =
your visits!"
I don't know about this! I think the fine print in the rules states that=
the log book needs to be signed so there is a permanent record of the vi=
sits to a cache. These little post-its will eventually get lost!
I think we on this listserv need to take a vote on whether he needs to go=
back and sign the logs. (With tongue deeply in cheek . . . .) [;)]
Actually though, congratulations Omniterranaut on your run. (By the way=
, what's with this long name? I'm wearing my fingers out typing it - and=
burning brain cells trying to remember how to spell it!) [:D]
Rand (RandMan)
=20
----- Original Message -----
From: Trisha
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:39 AM
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
Subject: [Az-Geocaching] Thoughts on Cheaters and Mos-skeeters!!
Hey all,
Just a follow-up on the "old cheater thread", not that I really care
all that much, but I happened to be doing a cache in Kingman on my way
to Reno (I'm still in Reno as I write this) that I noticed that the
alleged cheater marc_54140 had logged: Holly Moses (GC4385). Being
curious, I noted the date he logged online and when I found the cache
I checked the physical log and....well, no log from good ol' marc.
Wonder who he thinks he's fooling? Does he think there's prize money
at the end of the rainbow? Oh well... . . . . =20
Trisha "Lightning"
Prescott/Reno, be back this weekend
------=_NextPart_001_0001_01C32A9F.50BDF9A0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<HTML><BODY STYLE=3D"font:10pt verdana; border:none;"><DIV>Since the subj=
ect of not signing the logs has come up again, I could not pass this oppo=
rtunity to yank <STRONG><U>Omniterranaut's</U></STRONG> chain. [;)]=
Recently, Omniterranaut tied the record with <STRONG><U=
>Sprocket</U></STRONG> for most-finds in one day. As with past=
record holders (CacheLess, Webbman and Sprocket) they had all been given=
the third degree about their accomplishments. So far Omniterranaut=
's record has been unchallenged - nobody has given him the third deg=
ree . . . UNTIL NOW!</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>This last Sunday I visi=
ted five caches that Omniterranaut listed as caches he had visited on his=
record-tying day of finding fifty-four caches. I need to ask:=
"Where are your signatures in the log books or on the log sheets Omniter=
ranaut? What's with these little <EM>post-its </EM>with your name o=
n them stuck inside the caches? Two of them had fallen out when I o=
pened the caches - and had I not put them back in, there would be no=
record of your visits!"</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I don't know about =
this! I think the fine print in the rules states that the log book =
needs to be signed so there is a <U>permanent</U> record of the visits to=
a cache. These little <EM>post-its </EM>will eventually get lost!<=
/DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I think we on this <EM>listse=
rv</EM> need to take a vote on whether he needs to go back and =
sign the logs. (With tongue deeply in cheek . . . .) [;)]</D=
IV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Actually though, congratulations Omniterranaut=
on your run. (By the way, what's with this long name? =
I'm wearing my fingers out typing it - and burning brain cells tryin=
g to remember how to spell it!) [:D]</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>R=
and (RandMan)</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>----- Origin=
al Message -----</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-L=
EFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT:=
0px"> <DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt Arial; COLOR: black"=
><B>From:</B> Trisha</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial"><B>Sent:</B> W=
ednesday, June 04, 2003 11:39 AM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial"><B=
>To:</B> listserv@azgeocaching.com</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial">=
<B>Subject:</B> [Az-Geocaching] Thoughts on Cheaters and Mos-skeeters!!</=
DIV> <DIV> </DIV>Hey all,<BR><BR>Just a follow-up on the "old cheate=
r thread", not that I really care<BR>all that much, but I happened to be =
doing a cache in Kingman on my way<BR>to Reno (I'm still in Reno as I wri=
te this) that I noticed that the<BR>alleged cheater marc_54140 had logged=
: Holly Moses (GC4385). Being<BR>curious, I noted the date he logged onli=
ne and when I found the cache<BR>I checked the physical log and....well, =
no log from good ol' marc.<BR>Wonder who he thinks he's fooling? Does he =
think there's prize money<BR>at the end of the rainbow? Oh well... . . . =
. <BR><BR><BR>Trisha "Lightning"<BR>Prescott/Reno, be back this weekend<B=
R></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_001_0001_01C32A9F.50BDF9A0--