[Az-Geocaching] Re: Tucson Caches
skydad
listserv@azgeocaching.com
Fri, 3 Jan 2003 15:38:35 -0700
I have found the "easiest" caches with little or no hiking in the Tucson
area are from Team Scotti, In fact one we did not even get out of the car!
Normally we prefer really unique locations in the back country but for
grabbing some caches quickily Team Scotti's are the solution.
The Lunch Club
----- Original Message -----
From: <az-geocaching-request@listserv.azgeocaching.com>
To: <az-geocaching@listserv.azgeocaching.com>
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 10:45 AM
Subject: Az-Geocaching digest, Vol 1 #865 - 11 msgs
> Send Az-Geocaching mailing list submissions to
> az-geocaching@listserv.azgeocaching.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> az-geocaching-request@listserv.azgeocaching.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Az-Geocaching digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Prescott Caching Update (Tim Giron)
> 2. Some Questions??????? (Regan Smith)
> 3. Re: Tucson Caches (Scott Wood)
> 4. Re: in a nut shell (trisha@brasher.com)
> 5. Re: removing a lost log? (Scott Wood)
> 6. Re: Tucson Caches (Scott Wood)
> 7. Searching Archived Caches (Brent Milner)
> 8. Re: Prescott Caching Update (trisha@brasher.com)
> 9. Re: removing a lost log? (Scott Nicol)
> 10. re: Man Allegedly Uses GPS To Stalk Ex-Girlfriend (Jake Olson)
> 11. RE: Tucson Caches (Koch, Dan)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 07:13:46 -0700
> To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
> From: Tim Giron <tgiron@cox.net>
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Prescott Caching Update
> Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
>
> --============_-1170519252==_ma============
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
>
> >Hi all,
> >Well, we had a fun day HIDING caches....I hid 3 micros, some of you
> >Phx cachers may recognize some similar hiding styles, but one of them
> >is pretty unique and MAY be the smallest cache ever!
>
> Looks like another Prescott trek is due for our clan. This time, we
> won't try to get to Vanishing Pines in a passenger car and we'll
> stick to the around-towns!
>
> These two (which could be comfortably swallowed), are the smallest
> that I have experienced:
>
> http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=28464
>
> http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=28454
>
> Tim
> Team AZFastFeet
> --============_-1170519252==_ma============
> Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
>
> <!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
> <html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
> blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
> --></style><title>Re: [Az-Geocaching] Prescott Caching
> Update</title></head><body>
> <blockquote type="cite" cite>Hi all,<br>
> Well, we had a fun day HIDING caches....I hid 3 micros, some of
> you<br>
> Phx cachers may recognize some similar hiding styles, but one of
> them</blockquote>
> <blockquote type="cite" cite>is pretty unique and MAY be the smallest
> cache ever!</blockquote>
> <div><br></div>
> <div>Looks like another Prescott trek is due for our clan. This
> time, we won't try to get to Vanishing Pines in a passenger car and
> we'll stick to the around-towns!</div>
> <div><br></div>
> <div>These two (which could be comfortably swallowed), are the
> smallest that I have experienced:</div>
> <div><br></div>
> <div><font face="Geneva" size="+2"
> color="#000000"
> >http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=28464</font></div
> >
> <div><br></div>
> <div><font face="Geneva" size="+2"
> color="#000000"
> >http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=28454</font></div
> >
> <div><br></div>
> <div>Tim</div>
> <div>Team AZFastFeet</div>
> </body>
> </html>
> --============_-1170519252==_ma============--
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 2
> From: "Regan Smith" <buggers@mindspring.com>
> To: <listserv@azgeocaching.com>
> Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 07:18:15 -0700
> Subject: [Az-Geocaching] Some Questions???????
> Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
>
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_0071_01C2B2F8.4892A9C0
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> only 6 is a rethorical one..
>
> 1) Who found the First Cache of 2003?
>
> 2) Who/ Which Team placed the first Cache to be found in 2003?
>
> 3) Who found the last cache of 2002?
>
> 4) Will the first Addict :) who displaces Team Sand Dollar also =
> de-throne the Yellow Jeep?
>
> 5) Will the trend of multi-team cache attacks continue to grow?
>
> 6) What will the next "new" Urban cache container be? (besides the one =
> Team Evil Fish is making)
>
> I know that if I told you what the container was it would take the fun =
> out of the hunt!
>
> 7) Which cache(s) gave cachers a good hunt?
> The archived Jackrabbit and Playing in Camelot.=20
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_0071_01C2B2F8.4892A9C0
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> <HTML><HEAD>
> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
> charset=3Diso-8859-1">
> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1126" name=3DGENERATOR>
> <STYLE></STYLE>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>only 6 is a rethorical =
> one..</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>1) Who found the First Cache of =
> 2003?</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>2) Who/ Which Team placed the first =
> Cache to be=20
> found in 2003?</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>3) Who found the last cache of =
> 2002?</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>4) Will the first Addict :) who =
> displaces Team Sand=20
> Dollar also de-throne the Yellow Jeep?</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>5) Will the trend of multi-team cache =
> attacks=20
> continue to grow?</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>6) What will the next "new" Urban cache =
> container=20
> be? (besides the one Team Evil Fish is making)</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2>I know that if I told =
> you what the=20
> container was it would take the fun out of the hunt!</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>7) Which cache(s) gave cachers a=20
> good hunt?</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> <FONT color=3D#0000ff>The =
> archived Jackrabbit=20
> and Playing in Camelot.</FONT></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>
>
> ------=_NextPart_000_0071_01C2B2F8.4892A9C0--
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 09:33:22 -0700
> To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
> From: Scott Wood <wood@myblueheaven.com>
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Tucson Caches
> Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
>
> At 02:15 AM 1/3/2003 -0800, you wrote:
>
> >Are there any recommendations as to what caches we should visit? Keep in
> >mind that I don't want to get any caches that involve a whole lot of
> >hiking and take up a lot of time (easy urban caches will do).
>
> There are actually a quite a few urban caches down here now. I would
> suspect that it would take a good day to hit all of the urban
> caches. Remember, we don't have the freeway system down here to help get
> around town, but Saturdays is better than weekdays.
>
> There are also nice clusters or caches just out of town, but most of them
> require a little hiking, and if you want to get the best bang for the buck
> (caches for your time) I would stick with the easy urban ones.
>
>
> In liberty,
>
> Scott
>
> wood@myblueheaven.com
> www.myblueheaven.com
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 4
> From: trisha@brasher.com
> To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] in a nut shell
> Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 09:23:51 -0800 (PST)
> Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
>
> Hey Libby,
> Thanks for the congrats. Look for a few MORE caches up here in the
> next few weeks (we hope)....it's been fun having a little time over
> the holiday to actually go out and hide them. We have a few more
> ideas, hopefully somewhat original.
>
> Caches after dark, yes, I made a note and will look at all the caches
> around here that I know of and come up with a list of safe-night
> caches in Prescott (with a flashlight). I'll post it here when I get
> it done, soon.
>
> Take care and stay safe!
> Trisha "Lightning"
> Prescott
>
>
> "WOLFB8" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Have not had anytime for caching with the holidays
> and hope all had time to spend time with the people that matter in
> thee
> lives....and that everyone here has a happy new year.
>
> Congrads to everyone that has hit a mile stone in
> the last few weeks...(Trisha knew you would do it)
>
> Hopefully I will be able to get some caching done
> this month...Have to take one of my pups to Tucson for surgery on the
> 13...so I
> am planning on getting a few down there while they slice and dice on
> the
> pup....
>
> Trisha thanks for the urban caches up in Prescott..
> I have to be up thee 2-5 for conservation law enforcement conference.
> Kind
> of kewl the site stewart program is picking up the tab.....( anyone
> else
> going???) Hey Trisha maybe I can get a list of caches from you that
> will
> be doable after dark..
>
>
> peace out
> Libby
>
>
>
> We will be known by the tracks we leave behind
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From:
> Regan
> Smith
> To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
> Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 6:31
> AM
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] removing a
> lost log?
> I change the no find to a find with the updated
> information. but whateveryou feel confortable with is the way to
> go----- Original Message -----From: "Darin & Dani"
> <ddeehr@commspeed.net>To: <listserv@azgeocaching.com>Sent:
> Thursday, January 02, 2003 10:26 PMSubject: [Az-Geocaching] removing
> a
> lost log?>> Hi, I was just wondering what
> the current opinion was on removing a lost> (could not find) log on
> the
> web site after one actually finds the cache.We> have revisited a
> couple of caches lately and recorded finds where we had> losts
> before. Do I remove the no find or leave things the way they
> arewith> an earlier no find and the current found. Just
> wondering.>> Thanks for you help.>>
> Team DDJT + SWD.>> Another addicted Prescott
> cacher.>>>
> _______________________________________________> Az-Geocaching
> mailing
> list> listserv@azgeocaching.com>
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching>>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource>
>
http://www.azgeocaching.com_______________________________________________Az
-Geocaching
> mailing
>
listlistserv@azgeocaching.comhttp://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listin
fo/az-geocachingArizona's
> Geocaching Resourcehttp://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> "Although no one can go back and
> make a brand new start,
> Anyone can start from now and
> make a brand new ending."
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 09:16:53 -0700
> To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
> From: Scott Wood <wood@myblueheaven.com>
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] removing a lost log?
> Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
>
> At 10:26 PM 1/2/2003 -0700, you wrote:
>
>
> > Hi, I was just wondering what the current opinion was on removing a
lost
> >(could not find) log on the web site after one actually finds the cache.
We
> >have revisited a couple of caches lately and recorded finds where we had
> >losts before. Do I remove the no find or leave things the way they are
with
> >an earlier no find and the current found. Just wondering.
>
> I leave mine. I consider any log as part of the history of that cache. I
> also place interest in finding caches that others might have had trouble
> finding in the past.
>
> There is a cache south of Tucson that had a lot of couldn't find logs, we
> were one of the teams that couldn't find it, and the cache owner deleted
> all of those logs. I have to admit that I was a little upset about my
> couldn't find log being deleted since it contained information about
> meeting a fellow team at the location. Even though we couldn't find the
> cache, we had a really nice afternoon and chat with fellow geocachers. It
> would have been nice if the logs would have been left.
>
>
> In liberty,
>
> Scott
>
> wood@myblueheaven.com
> www.myblueheaven.com
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 09:34:15 -0700
> To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
> From: Scott Wood <wood@myblueheaven.com>
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Tucson Caches
> Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
>
> --=====================_126078==_.ALT
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
> At 06:33 AM 1/3/2003 -0700, you wrote:
>
> >lil sisters little sister
>
> I thought you might say that. :-)
>
> I would actually look at that one as the cache to do a search for nearby
> caches on. It is pretty centrally located here in town.
>
>
> In liberty,
>
> Scott
>
> wood@myblueheaven.com
> www.myblueheaven.com
>
> --=====================_126078==_.ALT
> Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
>
> <html>
> At 06:33 AM 1/3/2003 -0700, you wrote:<br><br>
> <blockquote type=cite class=cite cite><font face="arial" size=2>lil
> sisters little sister</font></blockquote><br>
> I thought you might say that. :-)<br><br>
> I would actually look at that one as the cache to do a search for nearby
> caches on. It is pretty centrally located here in town.<br><br>
> <br>
> <div>In liberty,</div>
> <br>
> <div>Scott</div>
> <br>
> <div>wood@myblueheaven.com</div>
> <div><a href="http://www.myblueheaven.com/"
EUDORA=AUTOURL>www.myblueheaven.com</a></div>
> </html>
>
> --=====================_126078==_.ALT--
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 7
> From: "Brent Milner" <milner@unicon.net>
> To: <listserv@azgeocaching.com>
> Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 10:00:39 -0700
> Subject: [Az-Geocaching] Searching Archived Caches
> Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
>
> Is there a way to search for an archived cache if you know all or part of
> the cache name? I know you can still get to those caches if you know the
URL
> or the waypoint, but in some cases, I don't know either.
>
> Thanks,
> FroBro Q-Tip
>
>
****************************************************************************
***
> The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential.
> It is intended for the named recipient(s) only.
> If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager
or
> the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any one or make
> copies.
>
> ** eSafe scanned this email for viruses, vandals and malicious content **
>
****************************************************************************
***
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 8
> From: trisha@brasher.com
> To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Prescott Caching Update
> Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 09:15:36 -0800 (PST)
> Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
>
> Hi Tim,
> Yup, I hope y'all make it up here soon, and take a TB back with you!
>
> Thanks for giving me the number for those 2 caches by Frobro's....
> they do sound VERY small, so let me re-phrase my statement: how about
> the smallest cache that has an actual log sheet that you sign in it??
> :-)
>
> Anyway, I hope you and anybody else looks for my new caches and has
> fun!
>
> Take care,
> Trisha "Lightning"
> Prescott
>
>
> Tim Giron wrote:
>
>
> Re: [Az-Geocaching] Prescott Caching
> Update
> Hi all,
> Well, we had a fun day HIDING caches....I hid 3 micros, some of
> you
> Phx cachers may recognize some similar hiding styles, but one of
> them
> is pretty unique and MAY be the smallest
> cache ever!
>
> Looks like another Prescott trek is due for our clan. This
> time, we won't try to get to Vanishing Pines in a passenger car and
> we'll stick to the around-towns!
>
> These two (which could be comfortably swallowed), are the
> smallest that I have experienced:
>
> http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=28464
>
> http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=28454
>
> Tim
> Team AZFastFeet
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> "Although no one can go back and
> make a brand new start,
> Anyone can start from now and
> make a brand new ending."
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 9
> From: "Scott Nicol" <arizcowboy@hotmail.com>
> To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] removing a lost log?
> Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 09:10:11 -0800
> Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
>
> Howdy,
>
> I will post a no find log anytime I cant find a cache. However, I delete
my
> no find logs once I find it. However, I will make mention in my find log
> that I had posted a no find log on a given date and also will make mention
> why I couldnt find it.
>
> I feel that a no find log is very important for future seekers of a
> particular cache. If there are several no find logs, maybe it is gone.
But,
> if nobody posts a no find log.. how is the next cacher to know!?
>
> I also feel the information posted in a no find log is always important
for
> the history of the cache, even if it is still in existance.
>
> However, I use my geocaching stats on azgeocaching.com (the only stats I
> look at) as numbers/stats/data and not so much as a diary of my geocaching
> 'career' (had to use that word!). These numbers basically represent to me
> how many outstanding no find caches I have out there to get, etc.
>
> I use my posts on each log as my diary (must be why they are usually
similar
> in size to a novel!). So, since I do want to see the history of my
> experiences with that cache (and remember those moments), I note in my
found
> log that I posted a no find log on a given date and the reason why I could
> not find it. This way, I can look back on that cache and remember my
> experiences with it. For those cachers that read all the logs, they will
> still read about my no find experiences.
>
> That's how I do it. If you look at Team RTW's geocaching web site, you can
> see my current progress as I list the caches I currently havent been able
to
> find.
>
> ------>
> On a similar note: I also feel it is very important to make every effort
> possible to post your find logs/no find logs as soon as is possible. I
> always log my caches as soon as I get home from caching (or that night; I
> just want them to show up in my stats the next day). I have only strayed
> from this a couple of times as I grabbed a cache on my way out of state or
> something like that and had no access to internet until I got home. I have
> seen some recent examples of teams find numbers going up but the last day
> they cached did not change. The only way that can be is if someone was
> posting a cache find several days later or even a week or more later from
a
> previous date before. It is not always possible to log a find right when
you
> get home from caching, but I feel it should be done as soon as it is
> convenient for you to do so. This way, if that log happened to be a no
find
> log or a find log with some valuable information.. future cachers (that go
> there before you log it) will have the opportunity to read your log.
> Particularly if it is a no find log.
>
> Scott
> Team Ropingthewind
> http://www.safwp.bravepages.com/geocaching.html
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Darin & Dani" <ddeehr@commspeed.net>
> >Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
> >To: <listserv@azgeocaching.com>
> >Subject: [Az-Geocaching] removing a lost log?
> >Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 22:26:04 -0700
> >
> >
> > Hi, I was just wondering what the current opinion was on removing a
lost
> >(could not find) log on the web site after one actually finds the cache.
> >We
> >have revisited a couple of caches lately and recorded finds where we had
> >losts before. Do I remove the no find or leave things the way they are
> >with
> >an earlier no find and the current found. Just wondering.
> >
> > Thanks for you help.
> >
> > Team DDJT + SWD.
> >
> > Another addicted Prescott cacher.
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Az-Geocaching mailing list
> >listserv@azgeocaching.com
> >http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> >
> >Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> >http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 10:41:01 -0700
> From: Jake Olson <insomniak@cox.net>
> To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
> Subject: [Az-Geocaching] re: Man Allegedly Uses GPS To Stalk Ex-Girlfriend
> Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
>
> After reading about this nit-wit... I started thinking. What would any
> of you attach this device to after you found it on 'your' car?
>
> I'm thinking a frieght train would be fun... he could track it across
> the country.
>
> Another idea would be to attach it to his own car.... and reprogram it
> to transmit a the location to be about 100 yards in front of the
> vehicle. Then we'd get to wonder which ocean would he eventually drive
> into.
>
> Jake - Team A.I.
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 11
> From: "Koch, Dan" <Dan.Koch@Eclipsys.com>
> To: "'listserv@azgeocaching.com'" <listserv@azgeocaching.com>
> Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] Tucson Caches
> Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 10:41:26 -0700
> Reply-To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
>
> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
> this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
>
> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2B34F.570C7E20
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Frieza,
>
> Here's a list of what we did on a recent day trip to Tucson...
>
> GC88CD Courage (V)
> GCB1F9 My Own Private Arizona
> GCB247 The Moon
> GCA844 Spanish Presidio San Agustin del Tucson (V M)
> GCB8B2 Heads Up (V)
> GCB3A6 Gadget Man's Lament
> GC8659 That Bites! (V)
> GCA6CD Level D Cache
> GC7C68 The Tucson Bugport
> GC7928 Search and Rescue (V)
> GC7D23 The Boneyard
> GC8668 Orbis
> GC87C3 Where Eagles Fly
> GC8BA3 Tortoise Food
> GC91C2 Road to Higher Education & "GOLF"
> GCA620 Location 2246
> GC9CE5 I didn't see any Palo Verdes in this park!
> GC85D4 Road To Eldorado (V)
> GC9357 The Great Wall of Stone Ashley
> GC9CE4 Mo's Cache
> GCB707 Rocky Point
> GCADFE Lil Sister's little sister
>
> (V - Virtual M - Multi)
>
> Longest walks were for 'Spanish Presidio...' (because it's a multi) and
> 'Rocky Point' (parking is at least .3 miles away).
>
> Think small for most of them. I think only two were larger than a small
tin
> can.
>
> Have fun down there!
> Dan
> LazyK
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Wood [mailto:wood@myblueheaven.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 9:34 AM
> To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Tucson Caches
>
>
> At 06:33 AM 1/3/2003 -0700, you wrote:
>
>
>
> lil sisters little sister
>
>
> I thought you might say that. :-)
>
> I would actually look at that one as the cache to do a search for nearby
> caches on. It is pretty centrally located here in town.
>
>
>
> In liberty,
>
> Scott
>
> wood@myblueheaven.com
> www.myblueheaven.com <http://www.myblueheaven.com/>
>
>
> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2B34F.570C7E20
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> <HTML><HEAD>
> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
>
>
> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2722.900" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
> <BODY>
> <DIV><SPAN class=738172417-03012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
> size=2>Frieza,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=738172417-03012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
> size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=738172417-03012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Here's
> a list of what we did on a recent day trip to
Tucson...</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=738172417-03012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
> size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=738172417-03012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>GC88CD
> Courage (V)</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=738172417-03012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>GCB1F9
> My Own Private Arizona </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=738172417-03012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>GCB247
> The Moon</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=738172417-03012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>GCA844
> Spanish Presidio San Agustin del Tucson (V M)</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=738172417-03012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>GCB8B2
> Heads Up (V)</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=738172417-03012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>GCB3A6
> Gadget Man's Lament </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=738172417-03012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>GC8659
> That Bites! (V)</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=738172417-03012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>GCA6CD
> Level D Cache </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=738172417-03012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>GC7C68
> The Tucson Bugport </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=738172417-03012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2><SPAN
> class=738172417-03012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>GC7928
Search and
> Rescue (V)</FONT></SPAN></FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=738172417-03012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2><SPAN
> class=738172417-03012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>GC7D23 The
> Boneyard </FONT></SPAN><BR>GC8668 Orbis</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=738172417-03012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>GC87C3
> Where Eagles Fly <BR>GC8BA3 Tortoise Food <BR>GC91C2 Road to Higher
Education
> & "GOLF" </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=738172417-03012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>GCA620
> Location 2246 <BR>GC9CE5 I didn't see any Palo Verdes in this park!
<BR>GC85D4
> Road To Eldorado (V)<BR>GC9357 The Great Wall of Stone
Ashley <BR>GC9CE4
> Mo's Cache <BR> GCB707 Rocky Point </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=738172417-03012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>GCADFE
> Lil Sister's little sister <BR><BR>(V - Virtual M -
> Multi)</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=738172417-03012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
> size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=738172417-03012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
> size=2>Longest walks were for 'Spanish Presidio...' (because it's a multi)
and
> 'Rocky Point' (parking is at least .3 miles away).</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=738172417-03012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
> size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=738172417-03012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Think
> small for most of them. I think only two were larger than a small
tin
> can.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=738172417-03012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
> size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=738172417-03012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Have
> fun down there!</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=738172417-03012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
> size=2>Dan</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
> <DIV><SPAN class=738172417-03012003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>LazyK
> </DIV>
> <DIV><BR></DIV></FONT></SPAN><SPAN class=738172417-03012003><FONT
face=Arial
> color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN>
> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
> <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
> size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Scott Wood
> [mailto:wood@myblueheaven.com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, January 03, 2003
9:34
> AM<BR><B>To:</B> listserv@azgeocaching.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re:
> [Az-Geocaching] Tucson Caches<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>At 06:33 AM
1/3/2003 -0700,
> you wrote:<BR><BR>
> <BLOCKQUOTE class=cite cite="" type="cite"><FONT face=arial size=2>lil
> sisters little sister</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>I thought you might say
that.
> :-)<BR><BR>I would actually look at that one as the cache to do a search
for
> nearby caches on. It is pretty centrally located here in
> town.<BR><BR><BR>
> <DIV>In liberty,</DIV><BR>
> <DIV>Scott</DIV><BR>
> <DIV>wood@myblueheaven.com</DIV>
> <DIV><A href="http://www.myblueheaven.com/"
>
EUDORA="AUTOURL">www.myblueheaven.com</A></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
>
> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2B34F.570C7E20--
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> _______________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
> listserv@azgeocaching.com
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>
>
> End of Az-Geocaching Digest