[Az-Geocaching] Congrats & Invitation to Phoenix
Andrew Ayre
listserv@azgeocaching.com
Fri, 9 Aug 2002 10:12:21 -0700
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C23F8D.402E7400
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Scott,
I agree with you too. I don't understand it either.
If they already have a GPS (which they almost certainly need) then they are
already inclined towards doing things outdoors. They may set off with the
idea of destroying a cache, but by the time they get there they may like
Geocaching! Plus when you place a cache you have to accept that it may get
removed/destroyed/etc. It is the risk of publically announcing where you put
something. If it does vanish or get destroyed you have the option of
archiving the cache, or replacing it. Until then it is there for other
Geocachers to enjoy.
Andy
-----Original Message-----
From: az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com
[mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com]On Behalf Of Scott
Wood
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 10:01 AM
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Congrats & Invitation to Phoenix
At 12:32 PM 8/9/2002 -0400, you wrote:
We will be changing our caches back to normal after the weekend. With
all the bad publicity, we thought it best to make them members only as a
temporary basis. Some of our caches are very delicate or specialized and
would be hard to replace if someone chose to destroy or remove them. Hope
this isn't too great of an inconvenience.
Let me ask a question. What exactly does this accomplish?
If you are concerned that a horde on new geocachers will damage your
cache, then what would be the difference if that same horde of new
geocachers find it the second week after the bad article? If you are only
planning on keeping them member's only for one weekend, aren't you just
delaying what you must consider the inevitable? If you are concerned that a
horde of land managers are going to be out this weekend and removing caches,
what will prevent them from waiting a week and doing it after they have been
moved back to being normal caches?
Somehow I just see this as wrong. What is the goal of hiding a cache? Is
it to provide something for others to find, or is it to help our own egos?
If someone chooses to destroy or remove our caches, they are going to do it.
If not this weekend, then perhaps next weekend, or the weekend after that,
or...
I posted a message about this yesterday and only received 2 replies,
either people don't want to talk about this issue, or I am the only one that
feels we are looking very snobbish to new geocachers by trying to hide our
caches from them? We welcome the new folks who signed up to this list
because of the Republic article, but we don't seem to want them to find our
caches until after this weekend. I just don't get it.
I will get off my soadbox now, but I really think that those teams that
have made their caches member's only should really consider changing them
back. If an item is so delicate or specialized that it can't be replaced,
perhaps it shouldn't have been used as a geocache.
Just $0.02 more.
In liberty,
Scott
wood@myblueheaven.com
www.myblueheaven.com
------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C23F8D.402E7400
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D063190817-09082002><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>Scott,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D063190817-09082002><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D063190817-09082002><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>I=20
agree with you too. I don't understand it either.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D063190817-09082002><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>If=20
they already have a GPS (which they almost certainly need) then they are =
already=20
inclined towards doing things outdoors. They may set off with the idea =
of=20
destroying a cache, but by the time they get there they may like =
Geocaching!=20
Plus when you place a cache you have to accept that it may get=20
removed/destroyed/etc. It is the risk of publically announcing =
where=20
you put something. If it does vanish or get destroyed you have the =
option of=20
archiving the cache, or replacing it. Until then it is there for other=20
Geocachers to enjoy.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<P><FONT size=3D2>Andy<BR> </FONT> </P>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><FONT =
face=3DTahoma=20
size=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>=20
az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com=20
[mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com]<B>On Behalf Of=20
</B>Scott Wood<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, August 09, 2002 10:01 =
AM<BR><B>To:</B>=20
listserv@azgeocaching.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Az-Geocaching] =
Congrats=20
& Invitation to Phoenix<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>At 12:32 PM 8/9/2002 =
-0400,=20
you wrote:<BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=3Dcite cite=3D"" type=3D"cite"><FONT size=3D2>We =
will be changing=20
our caches back to normal after the weekend. With all the bad =
publicity, we=20
thought it best to make them members only as a temporary basis. Some =
of our=20
caches are very delicate or specialized and would be hard to replace =
if=20
someone chose to destroy or remove them. Hope this isn't too great =
of an=20
inconvenience.</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>Let me ask a question. What =
exactly does=20
this accomplish?<BR><BR>If you are concerned that a horde on new =
geocachers=20
will damage your cache, then what would be the difference if that same =
horde=20
of new geocachers find it the second week after the bad article? =
If you=20
are only planning on keeping them member's only for one weekend, =
aren't you=20
just delaying what you must consider the inevitable? If you are=20
concerned that a horde of land managers are going to be out this =
weekend and=20
removing caches, what will prevent them from waiting a week and doing =
it after=20
they have been moved back to being normal caches?<BR><BR>Somehow I =
just see=20
this as wrong. What is the goal of hiding a cache? Is it =
to=20
provide something for others to find, or is it to help our own =
egos? If=20
someone chooses to destroy or remove our caches, they are going to do=20
it. If not this weekend, then perhaps next weekend, or the =
weekend after=20
that, or...<BR><BR>I posted a message about this yesterday and only =
received 2=20
replies, either people don't want to talk about this issue, or I am =
the only=20
one that feels we are looking very snobbish to new geocachers by =
trying to=20
hide our caches from them? We welcome the new folks who signed =
up to=20
this list because of the Republic article, but we don't seem to want =
them to=20
find our caches until after this weekend. I just don't get =
it.<BR><BR>I=20
will get off my soadbox now, but I really think that those teams that =
have=20
made their caches member's only should really consider changing them=20
back. If an item is so delicate or specialized that it can't be=20
replaced, perhaps it shouldn't have been used as a =
geocache.<BR><BR>Just $0.02=20
more.<BR><BR></FONT><BR>
<DIV>In liberty,</DIV><BR>
<DIV>Scott</DIV><BR>
<DIV>wood@myblueheaven.com</DIV>
<DIV><A href=3D"http://www.myblueheaven.com/"=20
=
EUDORA=3D"AUTOURL">www.myblueheaven.com</A></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HT=
ML>
------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C23F8D.402E7400--