[Az-Geocaching] Destruction of geological site(s?)

WOLFB8 listserv@azgeocaching.com
Wed, 7 Aug 2002 07:14:05 -0700 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_007A_01C23DE2.03A45600
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Interesting ....... I do agree with some point that they made....I am in =
to archaeology ...and know of some really kewl places that I wanted to =
share with other geocacher...not sure how they would respect the area I =
hide a cache about .1 mile from the site and in the log book told cacher =
how to get to the site ....if they wanted to explore it..... for what I =
can tell from the logs only 3 people took the time to look around.... =
most were into the cache and go bit..... now I know that everyone of =
them would have gone and seen the site if the got score for it....    I =
do believe that we have a right to visit all the archaeological site =
that are on public lands.....but I also think that virtual caches should =
be used at them to help prevent damage..... lets face it if each one of =
us turned over just one rock when looking for a cache.....after 20 =
people the landscape would look totally different..... From reading the =
article we all know what caches they are talking about....

just my 2 cents
We will be known by the tracks we leave behind
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Eric Quinn=20
  To: listserv@azgeocaching.com=20
  Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 6:17 AM
  Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Destruction of geological site(s?)


  Front page news on the Arizona Republic. You can read
  it on the web at
  http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0807cache07.html

  Lake Pleasant and the White Tanks are the areas named.
  The article seemed short on proof that geocachers were
  responsible.=20

  I think that we're about to see a number of government
  agencies pull caches that they didn't know exists or
  knew about but didn't care about. I also think that
  the addage "there's no such thing as bad publicity" is
  going to generate a ton of geocaching activity this
  weekend and next from new cachers.


  Eric
  TD

  __________________________________________________
  Do You Yahoo!?
  Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
  http://health.yahoo.com
  _______________________________________________
  Az-Geocaching mailing list
  listserv@azgeocaching.com
  http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching

  Arizona's Geocaching Resource
  http://www.azgeocaching.com

------=_NextPart_000_007A_01C23DE2.03A45600
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Interesting ....... I do agree with =
some point that=20
they made....I am in to <FONT face=3D"Times New Roman" =
size=3D3>archaeology ...and=20
know of some really kewl places that I wanted to share with other=20
geocacher...not sure how they would respect the area I hide a cache =
about .1=20
mile from the site and in the log book told cacher how to get to the=20
site&nbsp;....if they wanted to explore it..... for what I can tell from =
the=20
logs only 3 people took the time to look around.... most were into the =
cache and=20
go bit..... now I know that everyone of them would have gone and seen =
the site=20
if the got score for it....&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; I do believe that we have =
a right=20
to visit all the archaeological site that are on public lands.....but I =
also=20
think that virtual caches should be used at them to help prevent =
damage.....=20
lets face it if each one of us turned over just one rock when looking =
for a=20
cache.....after 20 people the landscape would look totally =
different..... From=20
reading the article we all know what caches they are talking=20
about....</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>just my 2 cents</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>We will be known by the tracks we leave behind</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3Dhalthron@yahoo.com href=3D"mailto:halthron@yahoo.com">Eric =
Quinn</A>=20
  </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dlistserv@azgeocaching.com=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:listserv@azgeocaching.com">listserv@azgeocaching.com</A> =
</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, August 07, =
2002 6:17=20
  AM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Az-Geocaching] =
Destruction=20
  of geological site(s?)</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT><BR></DIV>Front page news on =
the Arizona=20
  Republic. You can read<BR>it on the web at<BR><A=20
  =
href=3D"http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0807cache07.html">http://w=
ww.azcentral.com/news/articles/0807cache07.html</A><BR><BR>Lake=20
  Pleasant and the White Tanks are the areas named.<BR>The article =
seemed short=20
  on proof that geocachers were<BR>responsible. <BR><BR>I think that =
we're about=20
  to see a number of government<BR>agencies pull caches that they didn't =
know=20
  exists or<BR>knew about but didn't care about. I also think =
that<BR>the addage=20
  "there's no such thing as bad publicity" is<BR>going to generate a ton =
of=20
  geocaching activity this<BR>weekend and next from new=20
  =
cachers.<BR><BR><BR>Eric<BR>TD<BR><BR>___________________________________=
_______________<BR>Do=20
  You Yahoo!?<BR>Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better<BR><A=20
  =
href=3D"http://health.yahoo.com">http://health.yahoo.com</A><BR>_________=
______________________________________<BR>Az-Geocaching=20
  mailing list<BR><A=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:listserv@azgeocaching.com">listserv@azgeocaching.com</A><B=
R><A=20
  =
href=3D"http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching">=
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching</A><BR><B=
R>Arizona's=20
  Geocaching Resource<BR><A=20
  =
href=3D"http://www.azgeocaching.com">http://www.azgeocaching.com</A></BLO=
CKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_007A_01C23DE2.03A45600--